Single racial epithet can establish
a hostile work
environment claim |
Woods v. Cantrell
(5th Cir 03/24/2022)
http://case.lawmemo.com/5/woods.pdf Sent to Custom Alerts™
subscribers on 03/27/2022
Anthony Woods filed suit against
his former employer, alleging that he was subjected to a hostile
work environment in violation of Title VII.
He claimed
that in the presence of other employees, his supervisor, a person
of Hispanic descent, directly called him a "Lazy Monkey A__
N____."
The district court dismissed Woods’s hostile work
environment claim because "a single utterance of a racial epithet,
despicable as it is, cannot support a hostile work environment
claim."
The 5th Circuit reversed in a 3 1/2 page opinion.
The 5th Circuit held that Woods's court complaint states an
actionable claim of hostile work environment.
The court
said, "As other circuits have recognized, '[p]erhaps no single act
can more quickly 'alter the conditions of employment and create an
abusive working environment than the use of an unambiguously
racial epithet such as [the N-word] by a supervisor in the
presence of his subordinates.'"
The court also said,
"Furthermore, if supported with adequate proof, Woods could be
entitled to emotional and other damages that have been alleged."
Newest employment law court
decisions. Want them? Get them.
Employment Law Memo gets them to you first.
Custom Alerts™ get them to your exact criteria.
Get four weeks. Free. No hassle. No risk.
|
|
|
|
 |
|