28 day free trial



28 day free trial



28 day free trial

LawMemo - First in Employment Law

Home MyLawMemo About Us   Arbitrators
 

Celebrating our 23rd year.  Serving employment lawyers,
HR professionals, union representatives, and labor arbitrators.


 

 

 
On the Alert

PAGA settlement before
class certification carries a
heightened standard of review

Peck v. Swift Transportation (9th Cir 02/11/2022)
http://case.lawmemo.com/9/peck.pdf
Sent to Custom Alerts™ subscribers on 02/14/2022

The 9th Circuit vacated the district court's approval of a class-action settlement, holding that the district court erred in applying a presumption that the settlement was fair and reasonable, and the product of a non-collusive, arms-length negotiation.

Plaintiffs and Swift Transportation Company reached a settlement pertaining to plaintiffs' class claims, alleging violations of California labor law, and claims brought pursuant to PAGA, which allows private citizens to recover civil penalties on behalf of themselves and other current or former employees for violations of the California Labor Code.

The plaintiffs contended that because the district court approved the settlement before certifying a class, the court should have applied a heightened standard of review.

The 9th Circuit agreed, and vacated the district court's approval of the class-action settlement.

HOLDING: The district court erred in applying a presumption that the settlement was fair and reasonable, and the product of a non-collusive, arms-length negotiation.

The district court applied the presumption that the 9th Circuit reversed in Roes 1-2 v. SFBSC Mgmt, 944 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir 2019), which held that "[w]here . . . the parties negotiate a settlement agreement before the class has been certified, settlement approval requires a higher standard of fairness and a more probing inquiry than may be normally required under Rule 23(e)."

The court rejected attempts to distinguish the district court's order from the decision in Roes. The court held further that the district court's error was not harmless.

Applying the erroneous presumption "cast a shadow on the entirety of the district court's order."


Newest employment law court decisions.
Want them? Get them.
Employment Law Memo gets them to you first.
Custom Alerts™ get them to your exact criteria.
Get four weeks.   Free.   No hassle.   No risk.
 

 
28 day free trial

 

   

Home  |  MyLawMemo  |  Custom Alerts  |  Newest Cases  |  Key Word Search  
No-obligation trial  |  Arbitrators  |  Law Firms  |  Sample Memos 

 

Get your 28 day trial now 

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. 
It does not include Key Word Search.