LawMemo, First in Employment Law

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 


Ross Runkel


Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 

Click here for free 4-week subscription

NLRB Law Memo 
Also available by free emails

All Archives

« NLRB Law Memo 07/17/2008 | Main | NLRB Law Memo 08/06/2008 »

NLRB Law Memo 07/26/2008
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

NLRB Law Memo 07/26/2008
by
LawMemo - First in Employment Law.
Also by free weekly email.

NLRB - General Counsel Memorandum on ULPs involving political activity.

Guideline Memorandum Concerning Unfair Labor Practice Charges Involving Political Advocacy (07/22/2008)
http://www.lawmemo.com/nlrb/gc08-10.pdf

Part I of the memorandum examines the Board jurisprudence determining when employee political advocacy falls within the "mutual aid or protection" clause of Section 7. The Board's test is whether there is a direct nexus between employment-related concerns and the specific issues that are the subject of the advocacy. To illustrate how this test should be applied, the memorandum examines recent advocacy regarding immigration law reforms. Part II contains a discussion of whether, assuming that the object of the political advocacy at issue is within the "mutual aid or protection" clause, that advocacy is protected because of the specific means employed. The memorandum reviews the various activities in which employees might typically engage and consider when the employees' activity is protected. Part III contains instructions for processing charges involving political advocacy. Regions will submit all such cases to the Division of Advice with a recommendation as to whether a complaint is warranted under the analytical framework and discussion set forth in this memorandum.

NLRB - Staff summarized 1 decision.

Magic Beans, LLC (1-RC-22148; 352 NLRB No. 107) Brighton, MA July 18, 2008.
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/352/v352107.htm

The Board reversed the hearing officer's findings and found that the Employer's objection, effectively a post-election challenge, to Robert Collum's eligibility was not properly before the Board under the standard set forth in NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 333 (1946). The Board found that the Petitioner (Teamsters Local 25) was not on notice, prior to the election, that Collum may have been ineligible to vote. Therefore, the Board overruled the Employer's objection and issued the appropriate certification of representative.

(Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman participated.)

***



LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.
LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.
  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription 
 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.