LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

NLRB Law Memo 
Also available by free emails

All Archives

« NLRB Law Memo 04/07/2008 | Main

NLRB Law Memo 04/14/2008
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

NLRB Law Memo 04/14/2008
by
LawMemo - First in Employment Law.

Also by free weekly email.

NLRB - Staff summarized 1 decision.

Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd., Bar Technologies LLC, Fluid Power Manufacturing (13-CA-43487; 352 NLRB No. 47) Geneva, IL March 31, 2008.
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/352/v35247.htm

The Board adopted the administrative law judge's findings that an employee work stoppage, taken to protest mistreatment by a supervisor, was protected concerted activity, and that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by threatening employees with discharge, and then subsequently discharging them, for engaging in that activity.  In so doing, the Board found it unnecessary to pass on the judge's finding that the discharges did not also violate Section 8(a)(3), because finding the Section 8(a)(3) violation would not materially affect the relief.  The Board also found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by telling union-represented employees that they had no representation.  Finally, the Board amended one of the judge's conclusions of law and his proposed remedy to delete one employee from the list of unlawfully discharged employees entitled to reinstatement and backpay in the absence of any evidence that that employee had been discharged.

            (Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman participated.)

            Charge filed by Steelworkers; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1), (3), and (5).  Hearing at Chicago, Oct. 13-16, 2006.  Adm. Law Judge George Alemán issued his decision Feb. 27, 2007.



LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.
LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription