LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

NLRB Law Memo 
Also available by free emails

All Archives

« NLRB Law Memo 07/27/2007 | Main | NLRB Law Memo 08/10/2007 »

NLRB Law Memo 08/03/2007
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

NLRB Law Memo 08/03/2007
by
LawMemo - World's Best.

Also available by free weekly email.

NLRB - Staff summarized 2 decisions.

American Golf Corp. d/b/a Badlands Golf Course (28-CA-18753, et al.; 350 NLRB No. 28) Las Vegas, NV July 19, 2007.
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/350/v35028.htm

The Board, in a 3-2 decision, found that the Respondent lawfully withdrew recognition from Laborers Local 872 a little more than 6 months after resuming bargaining pursuant to an Order of the Board, which had found that the Respondent's previous withdrawal of recognition was unlawful.

The Board reversed a 2004 decision of an administrative law judge that found that the second withdrawal violated Section 8(a)(5) of the Act. Applying the factors identified in Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp., 334 NLRB 399 (2001), the Board found that a reasonable period of time for bargaining had elapsed after the resumption of negotiations pursuant to the Board's Nov. 2002 Order. The majority found it relevant that the parties had bargained for 8 months before the first withdrawal of recognition. Dissenting, Members Liebman and Walsh contended that the majority had misapplied Lee Lumber, in part by improperly relying on the earlier period of bargaining.

(Full Board participated.)

Charges filed by Laborers Local 872; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). Hearing at Las Vegas on Nov. 20, 2003. Adm. Law Judge Albert A. Metz issued his decision March 15, 2004.

***

Electrical Workers IBEW Local 2321 (Verizon New England) (1-CB-10559; 350 NLRB No. 29) Lawrence, MA July 18, 2007.
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/350/v35029.htm

The Board adopted the administrative law judge's finding that the Respondent Union violated Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the Act by charging Gregory Burns with the overtime hours he worked during a concerted refusal to work overtime, but not charging the employees who had refused overtime as part of the concerted refusal. The Board modified the Order to conform to judge's recommendation that the overtime rule be rescinded and to conform to the Board's standard remedial language.

(Chairman Battista and Members Schaumber and Walsh participated.)

Charge filed by Gregory Burns, an individual; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(1)(A). Hearing at Boston on Feb. 5, 2007. Adm. Law Judge Joel P. Biblowitz issued his decision April 11, 2007.



LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.
LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription