Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases  
Summaries and links to full text

LawMemo - First in Employment Law

Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Key Word Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Law Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

NLRB Law Memo 
Also available by email 

All Archives

 

« NLRB Law Memo 06/29/2006 | Main | NLRB Law Memo 07/10/2006 »

NLRB Law Memo 06/30/2006
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

NLRB Law Memo 06/30/2006
by
LawMemo - World's Best.

Also available by email.

Staff summarized 1 decision.

Supervalu Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Bigg's Foods (9-CA-39206, et al.; 347 NLRB No. 39) Cincinnati, OH June 23, 2006.

The Board adopted the administrative law judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by orally amending its written no-distribution rule in response to its off-duty employees' union handbilling activities and prohibiting off-duty employees from distributing union handbills to customers, and violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) by disciplining employees Amy Roberson, Helen Reardon, and Karen Brown.

In the absence of exceptions, the Board approved the judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by tape recording a conversation with and interrogating an employee on Feb. 26, 2002; promulgating a rule prohibiting employees from wearing union pins during working time; and maintaining and enforcing a rule prohibiting employees from entering its facilities (unless shopping) more than 10 minutes prior to the start of their scheduled shift or remaining for more than 10 minutes after the end of their scheduled shifts; and violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) by suspending employee Tina Morgan on March 8, 2002.

(Members Liebman, Kirsanow, and Walsh participated.)

Charges filed by Food & Commercial Workers Local 1099; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). Hearing at Cincinnati, April 28-May 1 and June 2-3, 2003. Adm. Law Judge Arthur J. Amchan issued his decision Sept. 23, 2003.



LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.
LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. 
It does not include Advanced Search.