LawMemo, First in Employment Law

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 


Ross Runkel


Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 

Click here for free 4-week subscription

NLRB Law Memo 
Also available by free emails

All Archives

« 01/26/2004 | Main | 02/06/2004 »

01/30/2004
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

NLRB Law Memo 01/30/2004
by
LawMemo.Com - First in Employment Law

NLRB - Staff summarized 1 decision.

Unifirst Corp. (1-CA-39267, 39321; 341 NLRB No. 1) Indian Orchard, MA Jan. 16, 2004.

The Board decided to publish a previously unpublished Order in the bound volumes of its decisions.

In the unpublished Order of December 9, 2003, Members Liebman and Walsh granted the General Counsel's request to reject the Respondent's reply to the General Counsel's resubmission of its brief in support of the administrative law judge's decision. Member Schaumber dissented. Citing National Metalcrafters, 276 NLRB 90, fn. 1 (1985), the majority wrote: "The Board's Rules make no provision for a brief in reply to a brief filed in support of an administrative law judge's decision, and the Board accordingly has stricken such a reply brief." They found no special circumstances to warrant a departure from the Board's Rules and stated: "to the extent that the brief in support filed by the General Counsel contained argument that is no longer relevant, the Board, consistent with its established policy, will disregard it."

In dissent, Member Schaumber concluded: "For justice to be done, it must be done with equitable administration. In these circumstances, the Board's administration of justice is, or appears to be, inequitable, and its denial of an opportunity to respond unfair." He found that the content of the General Counsel's brief, which was not written in support of the judge's decision, but which is being submitted for that purpose, provides ample cause for accepting the Respondent's brief in reply. He would, therefore, grant the Respondent's motion for the Board to consider its reply to the General Counsel's resubmitted posthearing brief, or in the alternative, its objections to that brief.

(Members Liebman, Schaumber, and Walsh participated.)



LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.

Comments

LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.
  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription 
 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.