Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Court approves E-Verify requirement | Main | Work Matters, by Mike Maslanka »

WI - No negligent supervision for security manager's internet posting of adulterated photos
September 01, 2009 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Maypark v. Securitas Security Svcs (Wisconsin Ct App 09/01/2009)

The employer of a security manager was not liable for negligent training and supervision when the manager took ID badge photos, ejaculated on them, and posted them on adult web sites.

Securitas provided security services for Polaris Industries. Securitas's security manager was responsible for creating ID badges, so he had access to photos of Polaris employees. The manager copied 30 photos while at work, took them home, ejaculated on them, and posted the adulterated photos on adult web sites he created. Some affected employees sued Securitas for negligent training and supervision, and won a bench trial.

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Securitas was not negligent as a matter of law, and that the injuries were too remote from the alleged negligence. The negligence claim failed because it was not reasonably foreseeable that unsupervised access to photos would result in harm. Securitas had provided theft and sexual harassment training, and Polaris owned, maintained, and monitored the guard shack. In addition, the court held that the injuries were too remote from the alleged negligence. The court characterized the manager's conduct as "bizarre," "unexpected," and "unimaginable," and said that allowing recovery "would have no sensible or just stopping point."

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.