Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Employment Law Memo 06/22/2009 | Main | Employer required to disgorge employee's emails to her attorney »

Supreme Court will hear False Claims Act qui tam case
June 22, 2009 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

The US Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist v. United States ex rel Wilson (Certiorari granted 06/22/2009) [Details, briefs]

Karen Wilson was an employee of the Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District. She brought a qui tam suit under the federal False Claims Act against various entities alleging that they had made false claims against the United States.

In a qui tam action an individual sues in the name of the United States and is allowed to keep a portion of the proceeds. However, there must not have been a prior public disclosure of the information of alleged wrongdoing that forms the basis of the suit. If there has been a prior public disclosure of information in an “administrative ... report ... audit, or investigation,” then the district court lacks jurisdiction over the case.

The issue in this case is the scope of the "public disclosure" jurisdictional bar contained in the False Claims Act, 31 USC §§ 3729-33. The district court concluded that certain audits and reports issued by state and local governmental entities satisfied the requirements of the public disclosure bar and therefore deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction.

The 4th Circuit concluded that the public disclosure bar applies to federal administrative audits, reports, hearings or investigations, but not to those conducted or issued by a state or local governmental entity.

This issue has divided the circuit courts.

The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the judgment of the 4th Circuit.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.