Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Decision by two-member quorum of NLRB was lawful | Main | Arguments for a stay in Golden Gate Restaurant Assn v San Francisco »

Restaurant owners to Supreme Court: Please help us
March 18, 2009 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Golden Gate Restaurant Association has filed an application [here] with US Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Circuit Justice for the 9th Circuit) asking that the 9th Circuit's decision in Golden Gate Restaurant Assn v. City of San Francisco be postponed. [Docket No. 08A824]

The San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance requires that covered employers make "required health care expenditures to or on behalf of" certain employees each quarter. "Covered employers" are employers engaging in business within the City that are either a) for profit, with an average of at least twenty employees during a quarter; or b) non-profit, with an average of at least fifty employees during a quarter.

The 9th Circuit held that this ordinance is not preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). More specifically, the court concluded that 1) the ordinance does not create an ERISA plan; and 2) the ordinance does not "relate to" ERISA plans within the meaning of ERISA. Golden Gate Restaurant Assn v. City of San Francisco (9th Cir 10/20/2008).

Last week all of the judges in the 9th Circuit decided that they would not allow a rehearing en banc. However, there were eight judges who dissented from that order. [Order, including concurring and dissenting opinions]

My source, with thanks: SSCOTUSblog

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.