Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Jotting about Michael Fox | Main | $3 million verdict - wrongful discharge »

Profanity was good cause for discharge.
August 14, 2008 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Montana's Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA) defines “good cause” for discharge as

“reasonable job-related grounds for dismissal based on a failure to satisfactorily perform job duties, disruption of the employer’s operation, or other legitimate business reason.”

When Thomas Becker told his department manager to "kiss my ass," and called his immediate supervisor a "prick," he got fired.

The Montana Supreme Court thought there was "good cause" within the meaning of the Montana statute. Becker v. Rosebud Operating Services (Montana 08/12/2008).

Becker's lawyer thought he should win, and cited Arnold v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, 100 P.3d 137 (Montana 2004), where summary judgment in favor of the employer was reversed - in spite of the fact that Arnold stated "f--- this" and walked out of her supervisor's office.

The Montana court distinguished the two cases. Arnold had been demoted even though she had been told her job prospects were excellent. And her bit of profanity was uttered in frustration. But the court couldn't think of much good to say about Becker's conduct.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.