Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Supreme Court takes three employment law cases | Main | 4th Birthday »

Medical marijuana law gives no protection from the boss
January 24, 2008 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Gary Ross got fired because his drug test was positive for marijuana. He was using marijuana to treat chronic back pain, doing so on the advice of his doctor.

Ross sued his former employer claiming disability discrimination and claiming wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.

He relied on California's Compassionate Use Act of 1996, which gives an individual some protections from criminal prosecution when using marijuana for medical purposes on the recommendation of a physician.

Only one problem, according to the California Supreme Court. The Compassionate Use Act was not designed to have any impact on employment law. The whole idea of the statute was to protect certain users from criminal prosecution. So Ross lost, and the boss won.

The case: Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications (California Supreme Court 01/24/2008).

Early blog comments:

California Supreme Court: No Accommodation for Medical Marijuana from What's New in Employment Law?

CA Supreme Court: Ragingwire affirmed from Storm's California Employment Law.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.