Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« LaRue v DeWolff - Transcript of an ERISA case in the US Supreme Court | Main | NLRB bombs use of email for union organizing »

Supreme Court will decide ADA accommodation case
December 08, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (certiorari granted 12/07/2007) [Details, briefs]
Decision below: Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (8th Cir 05/30/2007)

Pam Huber had worked as an order-filler until she became disabled. She sought, as a reasonable accommodation, reassignment to a router position which was vacant and for which she was qualified. The employer did not automatically reassign her to the router position, but required her to apply and compete with other applicants. The employer filled the router position with a non-disabled person who was the most qualified applicant, and placed Huber in a less desirable janitorial position.

Huber sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); the trail court granted summary judgment for Huber; the 8th Circuit reversed; the US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the 8th Circuit judgment. Oral argument probably will be scheduled for March 2008.

Huber's position is that the employer should have automatically reassigned her to the router position without requiring her to compete with other applicants.

The employer's position is that it has a nondiscriminatory policy of hiring the most qualified applicant, and that giving the router position to the most qualified applicant does not violate the ADA.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.