LawMemo - First in Employment Law

Ross Runkel, editor

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 
Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. 


LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Union loses "opt-in" agency fee case | Main | $984,970 verdict for National Guard member »

Supreme Court takes ERISA fiduciary case
June 18, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates. The US Supreme Court granted certiorari June 18, 2007. [Briefs and details]

LaRue was a participant in a 401(k) plan administered by DeWolff. LaRue's suit claimed that DeWolff breached its fiduciary duty by failing to implement his investment strategy, and sought recovery of the amount by which his account would have appreciated had DeWolff followed his instructions.

The 4th Circuit upheld judgment on the pleadings in favor of DeWolff, holding that (a) ERISA Section 502(a)(2) provides remedies only for entire plans and not for individuals, and (b) ERISA Section 502(a)(3) does not apply because LaRue was not seeking "equitable relief." The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the 4th Circuit judgment, and will schedule oral arguments for the Fall of 2007.

The "Questions Presented" by the certiorari petition:

1. Section 502(a)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(2), provides that a "civil action may be brought * * * by a participant * * * for appropriate relief under section 1109 of this title." 29 U.S.C. 1109 states that "a fiduciary with respect to a plan who breaches any * * * duties imposed upon fiduciaries * * * shall be personally liable to make good to such plan any losses to the plan resulting from each such breach."

The First Question Presented is:

Does § 502(a)(2) of ERISA permit a participant to bring an action to recover losses attributable to his account in a "defined contribution plan" that were caused by fiduciary breach?

2. Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(3), provides that a "civil action may be brought * * * by a participant * * * to obtain other appropriate equitable relief * * * to redress * * * violations" of the statute.

The Second Question Presented is:

Does § 502(a)(3) permit a participant to bring an action for monetary "make-whole" relief to compensate for losses directly caused by fiduciary breach (known in pre-merger courts of equity as "surcharge")?


LawMemo.Com


Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.
  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription 
 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.