« ERISA sponsor wins fiduciary argument | Main | Union loses "opt-in" agency fee case »
"Me too" case at the Supreme Court
June 11, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo
Ellen Mendelsohn claimed Sprint fired her because of her age during a company-wide reduction in force. She lost a jury trial. Mendelsohn claims that the trial court improperly excluded testimony from other former Sprint employees that they experienced similar discrimination during the same reduction in force.
The 10th Circuit held that because this evidence was excluded, Mendelsohn did not have a full opportunity to present her case to the jury. Therefore, the 10th Circuit ordered a new trial.
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 11, 2007 to review the 10th Circuit's judgment. Sprint/United Management Company v. Mendelsohn. [Details; certiorari briefs]
The Question Presented by the certiorari petition:
This case presents a recurring question of proof in employment discrimination cases: whether a district court must admit "me, too" evidence - testimony, by non-parties, alleging discrimination at the hands of persons who played no role in the adverse employment decision challenged by the plaintiff.The Tenth Circuit panel majority held that a court commits reversible error by excluding "me, too" evidence. This decision conflicts with those of other circuits. Specifically, four circuits have held "me, too" evidence wholly irrelevant. Five circuits have that "me, too" evidence may be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. Granting certiorari will resolve the conflict between the circuit courts of appeals on this important question of law.
Oral arguments will be scheduled for October 2007 or later.
Paul Secunda at Workplace Prof Blog is predicting that Sprint will win this one.
|
|
« ERISA sponsor wins fiduciary argument | Main | Union loses "opt-in" agency fee case »
|
Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.
|
