Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« 3.6% winners under Sarbanes-Oxley | Main | Ledbetter loses pay discrimination case »

Dayton v. Hanson - appeal dismissed
May 27, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

As I expected, the Supreme Court dismissed the "appeal" in Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson on May 21, 2007. So the lower court decision remains undisturbed.

Hanson sued his ex-employer - the Office of Senator Mark Dayton. The Dayton folks argued that the suit had to be halted for fear of violating the constitution's speech or debate clause, but the DC Circuit said things could go forward.

The Office of Senator Mark Dayton filed an appeal to the US Supreme Court. That was cute trick. Most cases get to the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari, and the Court gets to pick and choose which of those cases it will allow in the door. But if a case properly gets to the Court on appeal, then the Court has no choice and must decide it.

Very few cases fit into the "appeal" category, and this was not one of them.

Here is what I predicted, and exactly what came about:

First, there is a jurisdictional question. This an "appeal," rather than a certiorari case. A small number of cases from the circuit courts qualify for "appeal," and this is not one of them. So the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level.
Second, the Court can, if it wishes, treat the appeal papers as if they were certiorari papers and then go ahead and grant certiorari - in which case they would have jurisdiction. I expect the Court will not do that. The decision below was not wrong, there is no split of authority among the circuits, and the whole dispute really is not particularly important.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.