Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Multiple medical leave claims | Main | 3.6% winners under Sarbanes-Oxley »

Davenport v WEA developments
May 17, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Washington state law requires unions to get pre-expenditure permission (an "opt in" requirement) from non-members before using their agency shop payments for political purposes.

The US Supreme Court is poised to decide whether the Washington State Supreme Court erred by holding that law unconstitutional as an abridgement of free speech. Davenport v. Washington Education Association.

Now the Washington legislature has amended the statute to be more favorable to the union. So the impact of the US Supreme Court's decision will apply only to expenditures that pre-dated the amendment.

On May 11, 2007 the Washington State Legislature amended the statute by adding one sentence that clarifies the meaning of the word "use." The statutory amendment:

A labor organization does not use agency shop fees when it uses its general treasury funds to make such contributions or expenditures if it has sufficient revenues from sources other than agency shop fees in its general treasury to fund such contributions or expenditures.

All parties have filed supplementary briefs within the past few days. All briefs are here.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.