Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Whistleblower loses Supreme Court case | Main | IRCA did not override wage claim »

Is Ken Starr Supreme Court Justices' "employer"?
March 27, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

High Court Advocate Ken Starr Is Justices' Summer Employer is the headline for Tony Mauro's commentary at today's Legal Times.

An interesting story. Ken Starr wears three hats:

  • Dean of the Pepperdine Law School in Malibu, California
  • Of Counsel at the Kirlkand & Ellis law firm
  • Advocate for one of the parties in a pending Supreme Court case. Not just any case. This is Morse v. Frederick, in which a high school principal suspended a kid for unfurling a "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner at a parade.

Two Justices - Scalia and Alito - will be employed by Pepperdine Law School this summer to teach in a couple of summer programs.

At the Supreme Court Times blog I've raised the question of a conflict of interests.

Here I want to explore whether it is accurate to say that Starr will be the Justices' "employer."

Most lawyers will insist that the answer is no, a law school dean is not the "employer" of the law school's faculty members. The school is the employer of both the dean and the faculty members. It's probably more accurate to say that Starr will be the Justices' supervisor or manager. (Of course, for purposes of analyzing a conflict of interests, that simply shifts the question.)

Under California law, however, a supervisor can be individually liable for certain violations of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines (California Ct App 02/05/2007).

So Starr will not be in what I would call a traditional "employer" role. Yet he will be in a role which is not exactly "co-employee."

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.