Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« Ash v. Tyson tries a comeback | Main | Forgotten Workers: Unprotected Volunteers »

Supreme Court will decide ERISA fiduciary case.
January 21, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Do ERISA fiduciary duties apply when a plan administrator decides to terminate a plan? Are there fiduciary duties as to the implementation of the termination?

The US Supreme Court announced January 19 that it will take up Beck v. PACE International Union, and a decision is expected by the end of June. [Details]

When Crown Vantage Inc went into bankruptcy its board of directors served as the administrator of Crown's 18 defined benefit pension plans. The board began considering terminating the plans by purchasing annuities. PACE, representing employees covered by 17 plans, recommended as an alternative that the plans be merged with a pre-existing multi-employer plan.

The board went forward with its termination decision by purchasing annuities for 12 plans.

PACE brought adversary proceedings in bankruptcy court claiming that Crown's board breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by failing to give adequate consideration to the merger proposal.

The bankruptcy court agreed.
Beck, the trustee in bankruptcy, appealed to the district court which affirmed.

The 9th Circuit affirmed, holding that

  1. The decision to terminate the plan was a business decision not subject to ERISA fiduciary obligations
  2. The implementation of the decision was discretionary in nature and subject to ERISA fiduciary obligations
  3. Crown's board breached its fiduciary duty by failing to adequately investigate the proposed merger

The US Supreme Court granted certiorari on January 19 to review the 9th Circuit judgment.

The formal question presented to the Supreme Court:

"Whether a pension plan sponsor’s decision to terminate a plan by purchasing an annuity, rather than to merge the pension plan with another, is a plan sponsor decision not subject to ERISA’s fiduciary obligations."

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.