LawMemo, First in Employment Law

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 


Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 

Click here for free 4-week subscription

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

 

« When charging party refuses to cooperate with EEOC | Main | Harassment and constructive discharge »

Union can't photograph employees during literature distribution
August 01, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

In a dramatic reversal of its position in a 1999 case, the NLRB says a union engaged in objectionable conduct when its agents photographed employees during the union's distribution of campaign literature. In a 3-2 decision along party lines the Board overturned an NLRB-conducted election and ordered a new election.

The case: Randell Warehouse of Arizona, Inc. and Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association, Local 359 (NLRB 07/26/2006).

Detailed summary: NLRB Finds Union Photographing Of Employees During Organizing Activities Objectionable And Orders Second Election.

The Board found that employees have a right to accept or not accept the union's literature, and that photographing them as they make that choice would reasonably be coercive. The union did not provide the employees with any legitimate justification for the photographing. Thus, the Board found that the Union's conduct tended to interfere with employee free choice in the election, and directed that a second election be held. The majority opinion is signed by Chairman Robert J. Battista and Members Peter C. Schaumber and Peter N. Kirsanow. Members Wilma B. Liebman and Dennis P. Walsh dissented.

In a previous decision, the Board had applied a different rule for union photography than for employer photography. This new decision stresses that the rules for photographing employees who are engaging in protected conduct should be the same regardless of whether the party doing the photographing is a union or an employer.

The rule:

In the absence of a valid explanation conveyed to employees in a timely manner, photographing employees engaged in Section 7 activity constitutes objectionable conduct whether engaged in by a union or an employer.

Thanks to David Kight of Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP for the tip.

LawMemo.Com


Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription 
 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo