« No tax on emotional distress and reputation loss damages | Main | Anticipatory withdrawal of recognition didn't work »
Towboat pilots - an easy "Kentucky River" case
August 24, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo
Towboat pilots are "supervisors," not "employees" under National Labor Relations Act Section 2(11), says the NLRB. Not the biggest of the "Kentucky River" cases, yet interesting.
American River Transportation Co (NLRB 08/18/2006), decided by a three-Member panel. Not controversial enough for the full Board to address.
The Board held that towboat pilots had the authority, in the interest of the employer, to both responsibly direct the towboat crew and to assign work.
The majority opinion (Chairman Battista and Member Schaumber) said:
"Here, the Respondent’s pilots have the authority to make assignments and reassignments of the crew and order the crew to perform particular tasks such as standing lookout, repairing lights, cleaning windows, and fixing depth finders. During the course of navigation, the pilots use independent judgment to determine that the assignment of certain tasks to the crew is necessary for the safe passage of the boat and tow. The pilots do not check with others before ordering that action be taken. That the pilots’ instructions and orders often are routed through the mate does not diminish the pilots’ responsible direction inasmuch as the instructions and orders remain those of the pilots’. The pilots are in charge of the after watch and serve as the sole wheelhouse official responsible for the safety of the vessel, crew, and cargo. They have authority over the crew during emergencies. Finally, the pilots also possess the following secondary indicia of supervisory authority; higher pay, better benefits, and better sleeping quarters."
Member Walsh concurred in the result but not the rationale. He did "not agree that the majority's analysis ... is necessarily the proper way to harmonize the result in this case with the concerns expressed by the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care, 532 US 706 (2001)." He concurred based on previous NLRB cases on pilots, but does "not necessarily agree" with those cases.
More "Kentucky River" cases to come soon:
- Oakwood Healthcare, Inc., Case 7-RC-22141
- Beverly Enterprises - Minnesota, Inc., Cases 18-RC-16415 and 18-RC-16416
- Croft Metals, Inc., Case 15-RC-8393
Oakwood and Beverly Enterprises deal with "charge nurses" in the health care industry.
Croft Metals deals with "leadmen" and "load supervisors" in a manufacturing setting.
EEOC | NLRB | Supreme Court | Employment Law Blog | Arbitration Blog | Employment Law 101
