LawMemo, First in Employment Law

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 


Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 

Click here for free 4-week subscription

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

 

« Union can't photograph employees during literature distribution | Main | President nominates Liebman for another NLRB term »

Harassment and constructive discharge
August 01, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Sexual harassment can create fear that a manager "was capable of, and desirous of, physically assaulting [an employee] in a serious way." If so, then the employee "should have quit immediately to protect herself."

These quotes from Patton v. Keystone RV Company (7th Cir 08/01/2006).

Brenda Patton alleged that she was sexually harassed, and that her "quit" was a constructive discharge. The trial court didn't think so, but the 7th Circuit easily found enough to justify going to trial on both issues.

It's a sad tale that was told by the employee. The court summarizes it this way (read the whole opinion for the shocking details):

The conduct alleged in this case occurred over the course of approximately one month and consists of (1) four instances of physical contact, (2) a few sexually charged comments, and (3) alleged stalking.
The most serious of these is the inappropriate touching.
[The manager's] groping of Patton under her shorts might be sufficient alone to create an abusive working environment.

This was enough for the 7th Circuit to send the case to a jury on the question of sexual harassment.

What about constructive discharge? The harassment must be "more egregious" - "so intolerable that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign."

Here's how the 7th Circuit saw that issue:

A reasonable fact finder could agree with Patton’s fear that her supervisor was an obsessed man who - based on previous acts showing no regard for Patton’s right to control who could touch intimate areas of her body - was capable of, and desirous of, physically assaulting her in a serious way. We need not conclude that a rape or other assault was likely, but only whether a reasonable fact finder could find that Patton should have quit immediately to protect herself. We think the answer is yes.

My view: Was the district judge reading a different record?

LawMemo.Com


Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription 
 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo