Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« $17 million verdict against labor union | Main | Must employer front-end employee's attorney fees when employer sues employee? »

WARN Act no help for airport security screeners
July 24, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

When the federal government took over airport security screening, formerly done by private companies, a lot of employees got laid off.

Employees were laid off without getting a 60-day WARNing notice. So they sued the private employer claiming a violation of the WARN Act.

The 9th Circuit holds that the WARN Act does not apply here. Deveraturda v. Globe Aviation Security (9th Cir 07/24/2006).

Why? Because the WARN Act applies only when an employer orders a plant closing or mass layoff. In this case, the layoff was caused by the federal government and not by the private employer.

My view:

This seems to be the correct interpretation of the WARN Act, which says: "An employer shall not order a plant closing or mass layoff until the end of a 60-day period" etc. etc.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.