LawMemo, First in Employment Law

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 


Ross Runkel


Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 

Click here for free 4-week subscription

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog

« Mohawk v. Williams: RICO meets employment law | Main | Ministerial exception: putting churches above the law »

Transsexuals and Title VII
April 03, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Diane (formerly David) Schroer claims the Library of Congress didn't hire her because she is a transsexual. She changed from male to female. Schroer claims the Library violated Title VII by discriminating against her "because of sex."

There are currently three ways to handle such a case:

  1. The tradition view is that Title VII does not forbid discrimination because of transsexuality because that's not discrimination "because of sex."
  2. Recently there has been a theory that such discrimination can come under Title VII because it is "sexual stereotyping" as discussed in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 US 228 (1989), but that's a pretty shaky theory.
  3. A federal district judge in Schroer's suit now says it is possible that a transsexual can show discrimination "because of sex" without relying on sexual stereotyping. The judge denied the employer's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, saying that there are facts that Schroer could prove that would establish discrimination "because of sex." Schroer v. Billington (D DC 03/31/2006)

My view: I've got a fourth theory. Let's reason this by analogy to religion discrimination. If Schroer had changed from being a Catholic to being a Mormon, and the Library had refused to hire her for that reason, then I think that would be a clear-cut case of discrimination "because of religion." Schoer changed from being a man to being a woman, so discrimination on that basis is discrimination "because of sex."

Read more about Schroer v. Billington:

LawMemo.Com


Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.
  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription 
 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.