« Partners are "employees"? - EEOC v. Sidley Austin | Main | Employer must pay for psychotherapy time and travel time »
Wal-Mart lunch break verdict: $172,000,000
December 23, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo
In a class-action suit claiming that Wal-Mart did not give California employees a 30 minute lunch break, a jury brought in a verdict of $172,000,000.
The class of employees bringing the suit was about 116,000 Wal-Mart employees and former employees in California.
California law requires an employer to give a 30 minute unpaid lunch break to any employee who works over six hours. The employees claimed Wal-Mart violated that law, and the jury agreed.
The jury heard testimony for four months and deliberated for about three days before reaching a decision.
The verdict was for $57 million in general damages plus $115 million in punitive damages. Wal-Mart claims, among other things, that the California statute does not allow for punitive damages.
Wal-Mart will appeal.
Read more in Yahoo! News and at Law.com.
EEOC | NLRB | Supreme Court | Employment Law Blog | Arbitration Blog | Employment Law 101
