Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases  
Summaries and links to full text

LawMemo - First in Employment Law

Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Key Word Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Law Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog

 


« Same-actor inference | Main | ADA - Medical evidence not needed at summary judgment stage »

Article: Prohibiting employee conversations
July 10, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo


In both unionized and non-union workplaces employers may have work rules that forbid such things as:

- having "negative conversations" about managers

- making "false, vicious, profane or malicious statements toward or concerning [the employer] or any of its employees"

- using "abusive or profane language"

- "verbal, mental and physical abuse"

- "harassment . . . in any way"

No problem? Think again. These quotes were taken from actual NLRB decisions in which the employers were held to be in violation of the National Labor Relations Act.

It didn't matter whether the employers were unionized or non-union.

As this article points out:

There are numerous decisions by the NLRB holding that the mere maintenance of an overly broad work rule violates the law. The liberal members of the five-member NLRB, who were appointed by President Bill Clinton, penned many of these decisions. Despite the presence of a more conservative NLRB comprised of President George W. Bush's appointments, the decisions issued within the past year do not indicate an imminent change in the law.

The article: "National Labor Relations Board Holds That Union-Free and Unionized Employers Cannot Prohibit Employees From Having “Negative Conversations” About Their Managers"

The author: Alan Model, a principal at Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, a management-side law firm.


My view: Many employers continue to believe they can ignore the NLRB. Sadly, some lawyers believe this also. Truth is, they can't. A significant percentage of NLRB decisions involve non-union employers. Alan Model's article focuses on work rules that restrict what employees can say about management and about other employees, but this is only one aspect of the workplace where the NLRB gets involved.


 



Policy on reviewing books and articles:

  • I will review books and article dealing with any aspect of labor or employment law, but I don't guarantee to review everything that comes in. [Contact information]
  • Books: I'll need to see the actual book.
  • Articles: I must be able to link to a no-charge digital source such as a web site.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. 
It does not include Advanced Search.