« Walsh re-nominated to NLRB | Main | Tum v. Barber Foods - Petitioners' brief »
Is 15-employee threshold jurisdictional?
May 16, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo
Federal circuit courts have long been split on the question of whether Title VII's 15-employee threshold determines federal court subject matter jurisdiction, or is merely a matter going to the merits of a Title VII claim.
The US Supreme Court says it will review the question. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp (Docket No. 04-944), certiorari granted 05/16/2005, Decision below: Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp (5th Cir 08/02/2004)
Arbaugh sued in federal court under Title VII and state tort law. She worked at the Moonlight Cafe in New Orleans, and claimed that one of the owners of the corporation subjected her to a sexually hostile environment. A jury returned a verdict for Arbaugh.
Now get this. After the jury verdict, the defendants moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Title VII's definition of an "employer" and pointing out that the defendant corporation did not employ 15 or more employees and thus was not an "employer" under Title VII. The trial court converted the motion to a motion for summary judgment, and granted the motion. So, case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The 5th Circuit affirmed, holding that Title VII's 15-employee threshold determines federal court subject matter jurisdiction, and is not merely a matter going to the merits of a Title VII claim. The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the 5th Circuit decision.
The Courts of Appeals are split on this issue.
Courts holding it is jurisdictional are the 4th, 6th, 9th, 10th, and 11th Circuits. Courts holding it is non-jurisdictional are the 2nd, 7th, and Federal Circuits.
|
|
« Walsh re-nominated to NLRB | Main | Tum v. Barber Foods - Petitioners' brief »
|
Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.
|
