Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Employment Law Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic 
Also read LawMemo Arbitration Blog


« ADEA allows disparate impact claims - sort of | Main | Four-fifths test is not a safe harbor »

Physicians' non-compete clause OK in New Jersey
April 05, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Although lawyers' non-compete agreements are per se unreasonable and unenforceable, the same arrangements for physicians are OK. "Disfavored," said the New Jersey top court, but still enforceable.

The Community Hospital Group v. More (New Jersey 04/05/2005).

The court applied a fairly typical analysis to the reasonableness of the restrictive covenants, but with a heavy reliance on protecting the public interest.

The court found that it was reasonable for the covenant to prohibit the practice of neurosurgery for a period of two years. However, the court wanted the geographic area narrowed to no more than 13 miles. Most notably, the court found that there was a shortage of neurosurgeons in one emergency room, so in order to protect the public's interest the covenant could not include that emergency room.

My view: Nice job of balancing interests. Poor job of explaining why such restrictions are per se illegal for lawyers and not for physicians.

LawMemo.Com


EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.