LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

 

« Arbitrator nixes mandatory flu shots for nurses | Main | 4th Birthday »

Order vacating arbitration award reversed
January 06, 2008 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

The 6th Circuit applied its recent decision in Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union, 475 F3d 746 (2007) which held that courts were without authority to overturn an arbitrator's award which was arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority.

Truck Drivers Local v. Allied Waste (6th Cir 01/04/2008)

The arbitrator set aside the employee's discharge and ordered reinstatement with back pay and benefits. The trial court granted the employer's motion to vacate. The 6th Circuit reversed.

The major issue was whether the arbitrator's award violated Section 9.4(G) of the agreement stating that "the degree of discipline ... imposed for just cause shall be in the sole discretion of management and shall not be subject to modification by an arbitrator."

The arbitrator, citing Section 8.1 which prohibited the employer from "discharg[ing] or otherwise disciplin[ing] an employee without just cause[.]," reasoned that the just cause-inquiry required evaluation of whether the employee violated a work rule and then to consider whether the discipline was reasonable under the circumstances.

The court found that Section 9.4(G) was not clear on its face and could reasonably be interpreted as the arbitrator had done. The court found no basis upon which to vacate the arbitrator's award because the arbitrator was arguably construing and applying an unclear contractual provision.

The court awarded back pay from the date of the arbitrator's award until the date of the employee's eventual reinstatement. The court stated this was an appropriate judicial remedy reasoning that if an arbitration award was to be final and binding, the employer was required to reinstate the employee and pay him.

LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription