Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog

« December 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

4th Birthday
January 24, 2008 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Happy 4th Birthday to us.


LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.


Order vacating arbitration award reversed
January 06, 2008 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

The 6th Circuit applied its recent decision in Michigan Family Resources, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union, 475 F3d 746 (2007) which held that courts were without authority to overturn an arbitrator's award which was arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority.

Truck Drivers Local v. Allied Waste (6th Cir 01/04/2008)

The arbitrator set aside the employee's discharge and ordered reinstatement with back pay and benefits. The trial court granted the employer's motion to vacate. The 6th Circuit reversed.

The major issue was whether the arbitrator's award violated Section 9.4(G) of the agreement stating that "the degree of discipline ... imposed for just cause shall be in the sole discretion of management and shall not be subject to modification by an arbitrator."

The arbitrator, citing Section 8.1 which prohibited the employer from "discharg[ing] or otherwise disciplin[ing] an employee without just cause[.]," reasoned that the just cause-inquiry required evaluation of whether the employee violated a work rule and then to consider whether the discipline was reasonable under the circumstances.

The court found that Section 9.4(G) was not clear on its face and could reasonably be interpreted as the arbitrator had done. The court found no basis upon which to vacate the arbitrator's award because the arbitrator was arguably construing and applying an unclear contractual provision.

The court awarded back pay from the date of the arbitrator's award until the date of the employee's eventual reinstatement. The court stated this was an appropriate judicial remedy reasoning that if an arbitration award was to be final and binding, the employer was required to reinstate the employee and pay him.



LawMemo publishes Employment Law Memo.


LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.