Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog


« Nonmutual arbitration clause is OK | Main | Can a union assign its right to arbitrate to an employee? »

"Good cause" defined without a dictionary
May 12, 2007 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Arbitrator Carroll Daugherty's famous seven-part test of "just cause" has been around for many decades. Now the Ohio Supreme Court has bestowed its blessing.

Why would this even get to the supreme court of any state? Because a lower court had the interesting idea that Black's Law Dictionary's definition was the only way to go.

An arbitrator issued an award reinstating an employee who had been discharged.

The employer argued that the arbitrator improperly defined the term "good cause" in the collective bargaining agreement, asserting that only an ordinary definition such as from Black's Law Dictionary could be used.

The lower court agreed and vacated the award. [I can see all the arbitrators rolling their eyes.]

The Ohio Supreme Court cleared things up. "Good cause" was not defined in the agreement, and a law dictionary might be a poor place to find a definition of a phrase like "good cause" that has a special meaning.

Summit County v. Communication Workers (Ohio 05/09/2007)

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.