Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog


« Arbitration Lesson #9 - The 5 Cole v. Burns factors | Main | Employee reinstated, and then fired again »

Arbitration - Is Justice Served?
November 19, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

A Los Angeles Times article asks, "Is Justice Served?" The headline reads:

Hundreds of judges have deserted the bench to enrich themselves in a system of private arbitration. The arena is largely unregulated and tilted, many say, in favor of big business.

This article deals with California, where many judges leave the bench and take up "private judging" in the private sector.

The article's main messages:

  • A judge can make lots more money - and have more enjoyable work - by leaving the bench and becoming an arbitrator.
  • When the best judges leave the bench, it leaves behind lesser judges.
  • Arbitration is done in private, so there is no public record of a case. Nobody knows who won or lost, or why.
  • Big companies make their customers and employees agree to arbitration, by offering an arbitration agreement on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
  • The arbitration system favors big companies.


LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.