Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog


« Union can't assign judicial review right to employee | Main | Class-action arbitration and interlocutory appeals »

Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing - Arbitrator to decide arbitrability
April 12, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

An alleged Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower has to let an arbitrator decide whether his claim will be arbitrated, says the 2nd Circuit.

Who decides the question of arbitrability? Court or arbitrator?

  • General rule: Courts decide whether parties have agreed to arbitrate a specific dispute.
  • Exception: Arbitrator gets to decide the issue if the arbitration agreement clearly says so.

But there's some confusion when the arbitration rules are the NASD rules and the underlying issue is Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing.

The facts in Alliance Bernstein Investment v. Schaffran (2nd Cir 04/12/2004): Schaffran claimed his employer fired him in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower provision. The employer said he quit. Schaffran filed a demand for arbitration under the NASD arbitration rules. The employer resisted. So Schaffran went to court to compel the employer to arbitrate.

The employer cited an NASD rule that says a statutory "employment discrimination" claim can be arbitrated only if both parties agree to arbitrate it.

Schaffran argued that his claim was not an "employment discrimination" claim and that it came under the NASD rule that requires arbitration of all disputes.

So somebody has to interpret the NASD rules to decide where Schaffran's claim fits. Does a court do this? Does an arbitrator do this?

The answer is easy. The NASD rules themselves say that it is for the arbitrator to "interpret and determine the applicability of all provisions" of the NASD rules.

The parties agreed to be bound by the rules. The rules say the arbitrator interprets the rules. So it's for the arbitrator to decide the question of whether this case comes under the rules' general requirement to arbitrate or whether there is an exception because it's an employment discrimination case.

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.