Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog


« Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing - Arbitrator to decide arbitrability | Main | Class-action arbitration allowed in antitrust case »

Class-action arbitration and interlocutory appeals
April 19, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

(1) Court orders arbitration. (2) Arbitrator interprets agreement as allowing class-wide arbitration. (3) Court upholds arbitrator.

No big surprise, as the arbitrator is the one who is supposed to interpret the contract and to decide "procedural" matters such as class-wide proceedings.

The surprise was that the court entertained an "appeal" from the arbitrator's procedural ruling before the arbitration had been completed. Call it an interlocutory appeal, if you will.

My view: Seems to me that entertaining such interlocutory appeals of arbitrators' procedural rulings does not advance the process. Correct on the merits.

Timeline:

  • January 1, 2005: Court orders arbitration.
  • February 7, 2005: Arbitration begins.
  • October 12, 2005: Arbitrator rules on class-action issue.
  • April 6, 2006: Court approves arbitrator's decision.

    Roughly a five months delay.

Genus Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Jones (D. Md. 04/06/2006)

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.