Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases  
Summaries and links to full text

LawMemo - First in Employment Law

Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Key Word Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Law Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog

 


« Class action waiver in arbitration agreement was enforceable | Main | Post-employment defamation is arbitrable »

Lost arbitration agreement is enforceable
January 25, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Sorry, Your Honor, but I just can't seem to find the arbitration agreement that the customer signed. Can you help me out?

It seemed that a customer bought a car, and then some dispute arose between the customer and the car dealer. The dealer resisted having the dispute resolved in court, arguing that the customer had signed a written agreement to arbitrate. The only hitch was that the dealer could not produce the written agreement.

The lower court held that failure to produce the written agreement meant that there was a failure to prove that there was an agreement to arbitrate. (I can hear my first year law students laughing at this one.)

The dealer produced an affidavit to the effect that the dealer sold the car, all such transactions have arbitration agreements attached to them, and the form of the agreement would include the current dispute.

The 5th Circuit held that under the law of Mississippi it is not required that a party produce the writing if there is (1) proof that the writing actually existed at one time plus (2) proof of what was in the writing. (Can there possibly be a state that does not follow that rule?)

The question of whether there was an agreement to arbitrate is a question of state law, so the court held that the dispute must be arbitrated.

The case is Banks v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit (5th Cir 12/09/2005). Issued per curiam, no doubt because it was a no-brainer.

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. 
It does not include Advanced Search.