LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

 

« Class action waiver in arbitration agreement was enforceable | Main | Post-employment defamation is arbitrable »

Lost arbitration agreement is enforceable
January 25, 2006 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Sorry, Your Honor, but I just can't seem to find the arbitration agreement that the customer signed. Can you help me out?

It seemed that a customer bought a car, and then some dispute arose between the customer and the car dealer. The dealer resisted having the dispute resolved in court, arguing that the customer had signed a written agreement to arbitrate. The only hitch was that the dealer could not produce the written agreement.

The lower court held that failure to produce the written agreement meant that there was a failure to prove that there was an agreement to arbitrate. (I can hear my first year law students laughing at this one.)

The dealer produced an affidavit to the effect that the dealer sold the car, all such transactions have arbitration agreements attached to them, and the form of the agreement would include the current dispute.

The 5th Circuit held that under the law of Mississippi it is not required that a party produce the writing if there is (1) proof that the writing actually existed at one time plus (2) proof of what was in the writing. (Can there possibly be a state that does not follow that rule?)

The question of whether there was an agreement to arbitrate is a question of state law, so the court held that the dispute must be arbitrated.

The case is Banks v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit (5th Cir 12/09/2005). Issued per curiam, no doubt because it was a no-brainer.

LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription