Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog


« Use it or lose it | Main | Arbitration training DVD »

Federal jurisdiction to vacate $zero award
December 12, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

If a party in federal court seeks to vacate a $zero award, does the court have jurisdiction?

Assume there is diversity of citizenship. The amount of the award was $0. The amount that will be sought in the next arbitration if the $0 award is vacated was $2,000,000.

The question is whether the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 as required by the statute that grants federal courts jurisdiction.

The answer is yes.

So says the 11th Circuit. Peebles v. Merrill Lynch (11th Cir 12/12/2005).

An earlier case from the 9th Circuit reached the same result. Theis Research v. Brown & Bain (9th Cir 10/20/2004).

Source: Paul Secunda at Workplace Prof Blog: Federal Jurisdiction and the Vacation of Arbitration Awards

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.