LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

 

« Use it or lose it | Main | Arbitration training DVD »

Federal jurisdiction to vacate $zero award
December 12, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

If a party in federal court seeks to vacate a $zero award, does the court have jurisdiction?

Assume there is diversity of citizenship. The amount of the award was $0. The amount that will be sought in the next arbitration if the $0 award is vacated was $2,000,000.

The question is whether the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 as required by the statute that grants federal courts jurisdiction.

The answer is yes.

So says the 11th Circuit. Peebles v. Merrill Lynch (11th Cir 12/12/2005).

An earlier case from the 9th Circuit reached the same result. Theis Research v. Brown & Bain (9th Cir 10/20/2004).

Source: Paul Secunda at Workplace Prof Blog: Federal Jurisdiction and the Vacation of Arbitration Awards

LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription