Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases  
Summaries and links to full text

LawMemo - First in Employment Law

Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Key Word Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Law Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog

 


« Want to change California's arbitrator ethics rules? | Main | Appeal from arbitration violated rules and was frivolous. »

End run around state court
November 16, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Larry Wood sued his employer in West Virginia state court alleging state law claims of sex discrimination and wage law violations. There was an arbitration clause in his employment agreement, so you might expect the employer to file a motion to compel arbitration.

Not so.

The employer preemptively filed an action against Wood in federal district court seeking

  • to compel arbitration of those claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 4, and
  • to enter a prohibition against Wood from prosecuting the state action against AGLA.

The district court granted that relief and entered judgment against Wood. And the 4th Circuit affirmed. American General Life v. Wood (4th Circuit 11/14/2005).

My view:

  • Quite an interesting tactic.

  • What? They don't trust the state courts?

  • Why should federal court resources be used this way when an action is already pending in state court?

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. 
It does not include Advanced Search.