LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 

All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic

 

« Add to Google button | Main | Use it or lose it »

Arbitrator relied on document "extraneous" to CBA
November 28, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Can an arbitrator's award "draw its essence from the collective bargaining agreement" when she relies on a document that is neither contained in the collective agreement nor referred to in the collective agreement?

Yes, says the Ohio Court of Appeals. Cincinnati v. Queen City Lodge (Ohio Ct App 11/23/2005).

The City discharged a police officer, who grieved the matter to arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement. The discharge was for the cumulative effect of six charges against the officer. The arbitrator dismissed three charges and sustained three others, and issued an award reducing the discharge to a 40 hours suspension.

The City sought to have the award vacated on the ground that the arbitrator relied on "The Matrix," a table of discipline contained in the departmental Rules Manual. The trial court found for the City, but the Court of Appeals reversed - upholding the arbitrator's award.

The court held that it was proper for the arbitrator to use the disciplinary matrix in order to bring the officer's discipline into line with the discipline that the City imposed on other officers involved in the same incident.

The court noted that the "no-extraneous-source rule" would lead to ludicrous results in disciplinary-arbitration cases because an arbitrator could never compare the severity of discipline in similar offenses.

LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription