Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

LawMemo Arbitration Blog 
All Archives    |    All Archives By Topic  
Also read LawMemo Employment Law Blog


« Arbitration Law Memo | Main | Ross' Employment Law Blog: Try it »

Motion to arbitrate delayed, denied
August 18, 2005 by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

I don't know why a defense lawyer would wait 10 months before filing a motion to compel arbitration. Suit filed July 11, 2004. Motion filed May 19, 2005.

After some employees (who had signed arbitration agreements) sued claiming FLSA violations, the employer

  1. filed answers
  2. attended a scheduling conference
  3. filed amended answers
  4. engaged in written discovery and depositions
  5. participated in mediation
  6. filed counterclaims against two plaintiffs
  7. attended a pre-trial conference

And then a motion to compel arbitration. More than 10 months after suit was filed.

The trial judge held that the employer waived its right to compel arbitration. Robinson v. Food Service of Belton (D. Kansas 07/11/2005).

The employer argued that it set up the arbitration agreement as an affirmative defense in its amended answer.

The judge said that notified the plaintiffs of the employer's right to arbitrate, but not the intent to arbitrate.

My view: Don't appeal from this one.

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.