LawMemo       First in Employment Law 

LawMemo's reason for being: We publish Employment Law Memo - summaries of latest court decisions, one-click links to full text, three emails per week.   Try it. 

Home | Free Trial | Products & Prices | Feeds | Caselaw Database | Sample   
EEOC
| NLRB | Nat'l Arbitration Ctr | Supreme Court | Articles | Lawyers
Employment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101    
Employment Law Memo | NLRB Law Memo | Arbitration Law Memo

Quick Jump: 

Employment Law 101  

Employment Law 101 is a series designed to give you ideas and help you spot legal issues. It is not a substitute for a good employment lawyer or thorough research. For the most current developments in employment law court cases, try Employment Law Memo - First in Employment Law.

All Archives

« Sex discrimination #21 | Main | National origin discrimination #23 »

Race discrimination #22
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

Title VII prohibits discrimination "because of" "race." Most states have statutes that have similar language.

Another federal statute, 42 USC Section 1981, prohibits race discrimination when making or performing a contract. The relationship between an employer and employee is a contract, so this federal statute also applies. Section 1981 is especially important because (1) it has a longer statute of limitations than Title VII, (2) an employee does not need to first file a charge with the EEOC, (3) the employee might get greater damages, and (4) Section 1981 applies to even the smallest employers.

What does "race" mean under these statutes? The concept of "race" is not limited to Afro-Americans and whites. It includes Asians, Native Americans, and so on. There are cases that say "race" includes being Polish-American, German-American, and so on.

So, race discrimination is treating people in a different manner because of their race.

It is unlawful to discriminate because a person is black. It is equally unlawful to discriminate because a person is white or any other race.

About 35 percent of the charges filed with the EEOC involve claims of race discrimination.

The EEOC puts it this way:

It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of his/her race or color in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment. Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups. Title VII prohibits both intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that disproportionately exclude minorities and that are not job related.

Examples:

  • Employer allows whites, but not other races, to work overtime.
  • Employer assigns black employees to black neighborhoods, and white employees to white neighborhoods.
  • Employer relies on racial stereotypes (such as Asians are better at math) when deciding who should get hired or get a promotion.
  • Employer pays whites more than blacks who are doing the same work.
  • Employer bases pensions on actuarial tables that themselves are based on race.

Racial harassment is a form of race discrimination.

BFOQ. An employer cannot defend a case of race discrimination on the ground that it is a "bona fide occupational qualification."

Coming next: National origin discrimination #23: Employment Law 101

LawMemo.Com

Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.

Editor: Ross Runkel, Professor of Law Emeritus. email Ross@LawMemo.Com, Phone 503-399-8028. Copyright LawMemo, Inc.

  • Employment Law Memo emails designed for lawyers. 
  • Expert summaries of decisions from all federal and state appellate courts. 
  • Direct link to full text. 
  • Click here for free 4-week subscription