Free Trial / Sign Up Products / Prices / Samples About Us / Contact FAQs Home
Latest employment law cases 
Summaries and links to full text
LawMemo - First in Employment Law Emailed directly to you
and online all the time
Latest Cases Advanced Search Law Firm Directory Arbitrator Directory Law School Directory Legal Resources / Memos
Employment Law Memo
Arbitration Law Memo
NLRB Law Memo
Employment Low Blog
Arbitration Law Blog
Employment Law 101
Articles
Supreme Court Cases
EEOC Info
NLRB Info

Employment Law 101  

Employment Law 101 is a series designed to give you ideas and help you spot legal issues. It is not a substitute for a good employment lawyer or thorough research. For the most current developments in employment law court cases, try Employment Law Memo - First in Employment Law.

All Archives

« Pretext #18 | Main | Disparate impact #20 »

BFOQ #19
by Ross Runkel at LawMemo

BFOQ stands for Bona Fide Occupational Qualification.

A BFOQ can be a defense for an employer that has engaged in intentional discrimination. The burden is on the employer to prove a BFOQ, and it is a difficult burden.

Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibit discrimination because of:

  • Race
  • Color
  • Religion
  • Sex
  • National origin
  • Age

The BFOQ defense is available only in cases of discrimination because of:

  • Religion
  • Sex
  • National origin
  • Age

As Title VII puts it: Discrimination is OK "in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise."

No BFOQ for race or color discrimination.

Examples:

  • State prison hires only men as guards in a jungle-atmosphere male-only prison.
  • French restaurant hires only French chefs. (It won't work when hiring janitors because it's not "reasonably necessary" to the authenticity of the restaurant.)
  • Airline requires pilots to retire at the age of 60. (Won't work for flight engineers because the government does not require it and the Airline could individually test the engineers to see which ones would be a high risk.)

Coming next: Disparate impact #20: Employment Law 101

Follow Ross Runkel on Twitter.

« Pretext #18 | Main | Disparate impact #20 »

LawMemo.Com

EEOC | NLRB | Supreme CourtEmployment Law BlogArbitration Blog | Employment Law 101

 
Google
 
Web www.LawMemo.com 
This form will search the LawMemo web site. It does not include the Caselaw Database.